Key Results
All results are on Galaxy10 DECaLS (17,736 images, 10 classes). The primary metric is balanced accuracy (mean per-class recall), because the largest class is 7.9× the smallest. Accuracy of a classifier that always predicts the majority class would be 14.9%.
Classification
_facts/astrovision/FACTS_INDEX.md §3 and shown when hovering over a number.DINOv2 goes from 55.5% (frozen features) to 83.9% after 10 epochs at a learning rate of 5 × 10⁻⁶, ahead of EfficientNet-B0 (82.7%).
The fusion model is evaluated on a different test split (2,661 images, stratified) from the other models (2,660, random permutation), and an ablation of the same architecture shows no gain from the added modalities:
| Fusion ablation (30 epochs, test) | Balanced acc. | Δ vs DINOv2 only |
|---|---|---|
| DINOv2 only | 85.95% | +0.000 |
| + morphometry | 86.12% | +0.002 |
| + SDSS photometry | 85.90% | −0.001 |
| + morphometry + photometry | 85.75% | −0.002 |
Details: Late-Fusion Multimodal, Model Benchmarking.
Segmentation
The U-Net reaches a test mIoU of 0.540 against Otsu pseudo-labels (not manual masks). Its "bulge" class is by construction the brightest 20 % of pixels of the galaxy. See U-Net Segmentation.
Uncertainty
On the fusion model, conformal prediction at α = 0.10 gives an empirical coverage of 90.5% with a mean set size of 1.09 classes. Temperature scaling degrades calibration (ECE 0.049 → 0.120). See Uncertainty Quantification.
Hardest class
Disturbed galaxies have the lowest recall for every model: 0.53 for fine-tuned DINOv2, 0.44 for EfficientNet-B0. See Limitations.